Update of Regulatory Options of New Breeding Techniques and Biosafety Approaches among Selected Countries: A Review

Main Article Content

Silas Obukosia
Olalekan Akinbo
Woldeyesus Sinebo
Moussa Savadogo
Samuel Timpo
Modupe Adeyemo
Sunday Akile
Jean Kebere
Jeremy Ouedraogo
Aggrey Ambali
Diran Makinde


A new set of breeding techniques, referred to as New Breeding Techniques developed in the last two decades have potential for enhancing improved productivity in crop and animal breeding globally. These include site directed nucleases based genomic editing procedures-CRISPR and Cas associated proteins, Zinc Finger Nucleases, Meganucleases/Homing Endonucleases and Transcription- Activator Like-Effector Nucleases for genome editing and other technologies including- Oligonucleotide-Directed Mutagenesis, Cisgenesis and intragenesis, RNA-Dependent DNA methylation; Transgrafting, Agroinfiltration, Reverse breeding. There are ongoing global debates on whether the processes of and products emerging from these technologies should be regulated as genetically modified organisms or approved as conventional products. Decisions on whether to regulate as GMOs are based both on understanding of the molecular basis of their development and if the GMO intermediate step was used. For example- cisgenesis, can be developed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens methods of transformation, a process used by GMO but if the selection is properly conducted the intermediate GMO elements will be eliminated and the final product will be identical to the conventionally developed crops. Others like Site Directed Nuclease 3 are regulated as GMOs in countries such as United State of America, Canada, European Union, Argentina, Australia. Progress in genome editing research, testing of genome edited bacterial blight resistant rice, development of Guidelines for regulating new breeding techniques or genome editing in Africa is also covered with special reference to South Africa, Kenya and Nigeria. Science- and evidence-based approach to regulation of new breeding techniques among regulators and policy makers should be strongly supported.

New breeding techniques, regulation, USA, Canada, Australia, EU, Argentina, Africa.

Article Details

How to Cite
Obukosia, S., Akinbo, O., Sinebo, W., Savadogo, M., Timpo, S., Adeyemo, M., Akile, S., Kebere, J., Ouedraogo, J., Ambali, A., & Makinde, D. (2020). Update of Regulatory Options of New Breeding Techniques and Biosafety Approaches among Selected Countries: A Review. Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Bioresource Technology, 6(3), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajb2t/2020/v6i330083
Review Article


Schuttelaar and Partners. The regulatory status of new breeding techniques in countries outside the European Union; 2015. (Accessed August 3, 2018) Available:https://www.nbtplatform.org/background-documents/rep-regulatory-status-of-nbts-oustide-the-eu-june-2015.pdf

Lusser M, Davies HV. Comparative regulatory approaches for groups of new plant breeding techniques. New Biotechnology. 2013;30:437–446.

Sprink T, Eriksson D, Schiemann J, et al. Regulatory hurdles for genome editing - process vs. product based approaches in different regulatory contexts. Plant Cell Reports. 2016;35(7):1493-1506.

Eckerstorfer FM, Dolezel M, Heissenberger A, et al. An EU perspective on biosafety considerations for plants developed by genome editing and other new genetic modification techniques (nGMs). Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7: 31. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.0003/

Schmidt SM, Belisle M, Frommer WB. The evolving landscape around genome editing in agriculture. EMBO Reports. 2020; e50680.

Lee SW. Current status on the modification of the scope for GMO regulation on the gene edited plants with no remnants of inserted foreign DNA fragments. Journal of Plant Biotechnology. 2019;46(3):137-142. DOI: 10.5010/JPB.2019.46.3.137

Ishii T, Araki M. A future scenario of the global regulatory landscape regarding genome-edited crops. GM Crops & Food. 2017;8(1):44-56.

Custers R. The regulatory status of gene-edited agricultural products in the EU and beyond. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences. 2017;1(2):221-229.

Atanassova A, Keiper F. Plant breeding innovation: A global regulatory perspective. Cereal Chemistry. 2018;95:8-16.

Eckerstorfer M, Marianne M, Gaugitsch H. New plant breeding techniques and risks associated with their application. Environmental Agency of Austria Report. 2014;2:0477.

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis. 2012a; EFSA Journal 16; 2012. Available:https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2561

Beetham PR, Kipp,PB, Sawycky XL, et al. A tool for functional plant genomics: Chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides cause in vivo gene-specific mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1999;96:8774-8778.

Dong C, Sharp P. Oligonucleotide-directed gene repair: Promises and limitations for plant gene modification. Transgenic Plant Journal. 2007;1(1):10-16.

Lusser M, Parisi C, Plan D, et al. Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nature Biotechnology. 2012;30:231–239.

Breyer D, Herman P, Brandenburger A, et al. Commentary: Genetic modification through oligonucleotide-mediated mutagenesis. A GMO regulatory challenge? Environmental Biosafety Research. 2009;8:57–64.

Aarts M, Dekker M, de Vries S, et al. Generation of a mouse mutant by oligonucleotide‐mediated gene modification in ES cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:e147.

Gocal GFW, Schöpke C, Beetham PR. Oligo‐mediated targeted gene editing. In: Zhang, F, Puchta H., Thomson, JG, Eds. Advances in new technology for targeted modification of plant genomes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. 2015;73–90.

Moerschell RP, Tsunasawa S, Sherman F. Transformation of yeast with synthetic oligonucleotides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1988;85:524–528.

Yoon K, Cole‐Strauss A, Kmiec EB. Targeted gene correction of episomal DNA in mammalian cells mediated by a chimeric RNA. DNA oligonucleotide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:2071–2076.

Zhu T, Peterson DJ, Tagliani L, et al. Targeted manipulation of maize genes in vivo using chimeric RNAyDNA oligonucleotides. PNAS. 1999;96:8768-8773. Available:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8768.

Wassenegger M, Heimes S, Riedel L, et al. RNA-directed de novo methylation of genomic sequences in plants. Cell. 1994;76:567–576.

Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK. RNA-directed DNA methylation and demethylation in plants. Sci. China C. Life Sci. 2009;52:331–343. Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3139477/

Law JA, Jacobsen SE. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:204–220.

Matzke M, Kanno T, Huettel B, et al. Targets of RNA-directed DNA methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10:512–519. Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17702644

Zhang H, Zhu JK. RNA-directed DNA Methylation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(2):142-147.

Riddihough G, Zahn LM. What is epigenetics? Science. 2010;330:6004,11. DOI: 10.1126/science.330.6004.611

Hartung F, Schiemann J. Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: Opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU. The Plant Journal. 2014;8(5).

Chen Q, Lai H, Hurtado J, et al. Agroinfiltration as an effective and scalable strategy of gene delivery for production of pharmaceutical proteins. Adv Tech Biol Med. 2013;1(1):103. (Accessed May 16, 2020) DOI: 10.4172/atbm.1000103

Yang Y, Li R, Qi M. In vivo analysis of plant promoters and transcription factors by agroinfiltration of tobacco leaves. Plant J. 2000;22:543–51.

Song GQ, Yamaguchi KI. Efficient agroinfiltration-mediated transient GUS expression system for assaying different promoters in rice. Plant Biol. 2003;20: 235–9.

Li JF, Park E, Arnim A, et al. The FAST technique: A simplified Agrobacterium-based transformation method for transient gene expression analysis in seedlings of Arabidopsis and other plant species from suspension culture. Plant Methods. 2009;5:1–15.

Norkunas K, Harding R, Dale J, et al. Improving agroinfiltration-based transient gene expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Methods. 2018;14(71).

Chen Q, Lai H. Gene delivery into plant cells for recombinant protein production. BioMed Research International. 2015;10. Article ID: 932161. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/932161

Bevan M, Barnes WM, Chilton MD. Structure and transcription of the nopaline synthase gene region of T-DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11:369–385.

Herrera-Estrella L, Depicker A, Van Montagu M, et al. Expression of chimeric genes transferred into plant cells using a Ti-plasmid-derived vector. Nature. 1983;303:209–13.

Bashandy H, Jalkanen S, Teeri TH. Within leaf variation is the largest source of variation in agroinfiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana. In: Bashandy et al. Eds. Plant Methods. 2015;11:47. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-015-0091-5

Gelvin SB. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: The biology behind the gene-jockeying tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67:16–37.

Dirks R, van Dun K, De Soo B, et al. Reverse breeding: A novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2009;7:837–845.

Schaart JG, Visser RF. Novel plant breedings techniques - consequences of new genetic modification-based techniques in Schaart, J.G. and Visser, RGF, novel plant breeding techniques - consequences of new genetic modification-based techniques in comparison to conventional plant breeding. COGEM Research Report Number 2009-02. The Netherlands Commission on Genetic Modification; 2009.

Puchta H, Fauser F. Gene targeting in plants: 25 years later. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013;7:629-637.

Voytas DF. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2013;64:327- 350.

Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF. Zfn, Talens and CRISPR/CAS-based methods for genome engineering. Trends in Biotechnology. 2013;31:397-405.

Sugisaki H, Kanazaw S. New restriction endonucleases from Flavobacterium okeanokoites (FokI) and Micrococcus luteus (MluI). Gene. 1981;16(1-3):73-8.

Kim SC, Podhajska AJ. Cleaving DNA at any predetermined site with adapter-primers and class-IIS restriction enzymes. Science. 1988;:240(4851):504-6.

Kim YG, Shi JM, Chandrasegaran S. Site-specific cleavage of DNA-RNA hybrids by zinc finger/FokI cleavage domain fusions. Gene. 1997;203:43–49.

Boch J, Bonas U. Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: Discovery and function. Annual Review of Phyto-pathology. 2010;48:419–36.

Christian M, Cermak T, Doyle EL, et al. Targeting DNA double-stranded break with TAL effector nucleases. Genetics. 2010;186(2):757–61.

Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, et al. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:390-392.

Li T, Huang S, Jiang WZ, et al. TAL nucleases (TALENs): Hybrid proteins composed of TAL effectors and FokI DNA-cleavage domain. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;9(1):359–72.

Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, et al. Breaking the code of DNA binning specificity TA-type III effectors. Science. 2009;326:1509-12.

Belfort M, Roberts RJ. Homing endonucleases: Keeping the house in order. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17): 3379–3388.

Podevin N, Devos Y, Davies HV, et al. Transgenic or not? Biotechnology-based plant breeding techniques and the regulatory landscape. EMBO Reports. 2012;3:1057.

Antunes MS, Smith JJ, Jantz D, et al. Targeted DNA excision in Arabidopsis by a re-engineered homing endonuclease. BMC Biotechnol. 2012;12:86.

Gao H, Smith J, Yang M, et al. Heritable targeted mutagenesis in maize using a designed endonuclease. Plant J. 2010;61: 176–187.

Tzfira T, Weinthal D, Marton I, et al. Genome modifications in plant cells by custom-made restriction enzymes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2012;373–389.

Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 2007;315(5819):1709–12.

Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. PMID; 2013. (Accessed September 15, 2020) Available:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23929338

Mao Y, Zhang H, Xu N, et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol Plant. 2013;6(6):2008 2011.

Ledford H. CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature 2015;522(7554):20–24.

Ledford H. CRISPR: Gene editing is just the beginning. Nature. 2016;531(7593): 56–9.

Maxmen A. The Genesis Engine. WIRED; 2015. (Retrieved 2016-06-05)

Hille F, Richter H, Wong SP et al. The Biology of CRISPR-Cas: Backward and Forward. Cell. 2018;172(6):1239–1259.

Hendel A, Bak RO, Clark JT, et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in humans’ primary cells. Nature Biotechnology. 2015;33(9):985–9.

Mohanraju P, Makarova KS, Zetsche B, et al. Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems. Science. 2016;353(6299): aad5147.

Travis J. Breakthrough of the year-CRISPR makes the cut science magazine. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2015. (Accessed January 7, 2020) Available:https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/12/and-science-s-2015-breakthrough-year

Podevin N, Davies HV, Hartung F, et al. Site-directed nucleases: A paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends in Biotechnology. 2013;31(6):375-383.

Pacher M, Schmidt-Puchta W, Puchta H. Two unlinked double-strand breaks can induce reciprocal exchanges in plant genomes via homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining. Genetics 2007;5:21–29.

CropLife. Site Directed Nucleases (SDN) for targeted genome modification; 2005. (Accessed September 16, 2020) Available:https://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf_files/SDN-Position-Paper.pdfcR

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed using Zinc Finger Nuclease 3 and other Site-Directed Nucleases with similar function. Journal. 2012b;10:2943. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2943–1061

Xu J, Hua K, Lang Z. Genome editing for horticultural crop improvement. Horticulture Research. 2019;6:113. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0196-5.

Zhang Y, Massel K, Ian D, et al, Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biology. 2018;19:210. Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1586-y

Gearing M. CRISPR - Cytosine and Adenine Base Editors; 2020. (Accessed September 13, 2020) Available:https://blog.addgene.org/single-base-editing-with-crispr

Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, et al. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature. 2016;533:420–424. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17946

Koblan LW, Doman JL, Wilson C, et al. Improving cytidine and adenine base editors by expression optimization and ancestral reconstruction. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:843–846. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4172

Komor AC, Zhao KT, Packer MS, et al. Improved base excision repair inhibition and bacteriophage Mu Gam protein yields C: G-to-T: A base editors with higher efficiency and product purity. Sci Adv. 2017;3:eaao4774. Available:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aao4774.

Gaudelli NM, Lam DK, Rees HA, et al. Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;8:892–900. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0491-6

Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature. 2017;551:464–471. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24644.

Richter MF, Zhao KT, Eton E, et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:883–891. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0453-z

Zhang X, Zhu B, Chen L, et al. Dual base editor catalyzes both cytosine and adenine base conversions in human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:856–860. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0527-y

Grünewald J, Zhou R, Lareau CA, et al. A dual-deaminase CRISPR base editor enables concurrent adenine and cytosine editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;8:861–864. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0535-y

Liang Z, Chen K, Zhang Y, et al. Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins. Nat Protoc. 2017;13:413–430. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.145.

Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, et al. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:1162–1164.

Zhang Y, Liang Z, Zong Y, et al. Efficient and transgene-free genome editing in wheat through transient expression of CRISPR/Cas9 DNA or RNA. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12617.

Liang Z, Chen K, Li T, et al. Efficient DNA-free genome editing of bread wheat using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14261. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14261

Brandt KM, Gunn H, Moretti N, et al. Streamlined protocol for wheat (Triticum aestivum) protoplast isolation and transformation with CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes. Front. Plant Sci; 2020. (Accessed August 2020) Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00769

Paul B, Montoya G. CRISPR-Cas12a: Functional overview and applications. Biomed J. 2020;43(1):8-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.bj.2019.10.005

Epub 2020 Feb 5. (Accessed September 13, 2020)

Nishimasu H, Nureki O. Structures and mechanisms of CRISPR RNA-guided effector nucleases. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2017;43:68-78. (Accessed September 16, 2020) Available:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959440X16301981

Cohen J. New ‘prime’ genome editor could surpass CRISPR; 2019. (Accessed September 16, 2020) Available:https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/10/new-prime-genome-editor-could-surpass-crispr

Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature. 2019;576:149–157. Available:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4

Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell. 2015;163(3):759-771. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038

Moon SB, Kim DY, Ko JH, et al. Recent advances in the CRISPR genome editing tool set. Exp Mol Med. 2019;51(11):130.

Published online 2019 Nov 5. DOI: 10.1038/s12276-019-0339-7 PMCID: PMC6828703

McCammon SZ, Mendelsohn M. Innovation and the regulation of products of agricultural biotechnology in the United States of America. Transgenic Res. 2019;28:183–186. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00150-5

OSTP (Office of Science Technology Policy). National strategy for modernizing the regulatory system for biotechnology products. Executive Office of the President; 2016. (Accessed 25 Aug 2018) Available:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/biotech_national_strategy_final.pdf

OSTP. Modernizing the regulatory system for biotechnology products: Final version of the 2017 update to the coordinated framework for the regulation of biotechnology. Executive Office of the President; 2017. (Accessed May 19, 2020) Available:https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/2017_coordinated_framework_update.pdf

USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). Secretary perdue issues USDA statement on plant breeding innovation; 2018a. (Accessed June 17, 2020) (Accessed May 28, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/brs-news-and-nformation/2018_brs_news/plant_breeding

USDA. USDA SECURE Rule Paves Way for Agricultural Innovation; 2020a. (Accessed May 29, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/newsroom/news/sa_by_date/sa-2020/secure

USDA. Request for regulatory status of salinity tolerant rice genotypes; 2020b. (Accessed May 19, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/17-286-01_air_response_signed.pdf

USDA. APHIS regulation of cisgenic scab resistant apple cultivar Gala and disease resistant cisgenic plants; 2012. (Accessed May 14, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/aphis_response_schouten.pdf

Sauer NJ, Mozoruk J, Miller RB, et al. Oligonucleotide‐directed mutagenesis for precision gene editing. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 2015;14(2).

Health Canada. Novel food information - cibus canola event 5715 imidazolinone and sulfonylurea herbicide tolerant; 2016a. (Accessed September 2016) Available:https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/genetically-modified-foods-other-novel-foods/approved-products/novel-food-information-cibus-canola-event-5715-imidazolinone-sulfonylurea-herbicide-tolerant.html

USDA. Confirmation of regulatory status of waxy com developed by CRISPR-Cas Technology; 2016. (Accessed May 18, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/15-352-01_air_response_signed.pdf

USDA. Confirmation of regulatory status of CRISPR-Cas Corn with improved Resistance to Northern Leaf Blight; 2018b. (Accessed September 15, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/17-076-01_air_response_signed.pdf

Schmidt DH. Director, registration and regulatory affairs - Nmih America DuPont Pioneer; 2017. (Accessed June 17, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/17-076-01_air_inquiry_a1_cbidel.pdf

USDA. Response to letter of Inquiry. Confirmation of the regulatory status of genome edited rice with resistance to bacterial blight; 2020b. (Accessed September 7, 2020) (Accessed September 15, 2020) Available:https://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/downloads/reg_loi/20-143-01_air_response_signed.pdf

Health Canada. Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Novel Foods; 2006. (Accessed May 19, 2020) Available:https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/legislation-guidelines/guidance-documents/guidelines-safety-assessment-novel-foods-derived-plants-microorganisms.html

Smyth SJ. Canadian regulatory perspectives on genome engineered crops. GM Crops and Food. 2017;8:35–43. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2016.1257468

Whelan AI, Lema MA. Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques in Argentina. GM Crops Food. 2015;6(4):253–265.

Lema M. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina. Transgenic Res. 2019;28:147–150. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-01900145-2

Whelan AI, Lema MA. Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology: Country report—Argentina. In: Dederer H-G, Hamburger D (Eds) Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology: A comparative analysis of the regulatory framework for genome-edited plants in selected countries. Springer, Heidelberg. 2018;1–57.

Whelan AI, Lema MA. Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology: Argentina. In: Dederer HG, Hamburger D. (Eds) Regulation of Genome Editing in Plant Biotechnology. Springer, Cham; 2019. (Accessed September 15, 2020) Available:https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-17119-3_2

EC. Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release of GMOs into the environment; 2001. (Accessed July 9, 2020) Available:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0018

EC. Regulation (EC) 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed; 2003a. (Accessed July 9, 2020) Available:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003R1829

EC Directive 2009/41/EC on contained use of genetically modified organisms; 2009. (Accessed July 9, 2020) Available:https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2009_41/dir_2009_41_en.pdf

EC. Regulation (EC) 1830/2003 concerning the traceability and labelling of Genetically modified organisms and the traceability of food and feed products produced from genetically modified organisms; 2003b. (Accessed July 9, 2020) Available:http://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2003/1830/contents

European Commission (EC). Directorate-general for research and innovation. New techniques in agricultural biotechnology. Brussels: European Commission; 2017. (Accessed May 17, 2020) Available:file:///C:/Users/hp/Desktop/ABNE%202019/Publication%20April%202020/References%202020/European%20Union/explanatory_note_new_techniques_agricultural_biotechnology.pdf

Scientific Advisory Mechanism (SAM). New techniques in agricultural biotechnology. High Level Group of Scientific Advisors Explanatory Note 02/2017. European Commission; 2017. (Accessed May 22, 2020) Available:https://ec.europa.eu/research/sam/pdf/topics/explanatory_note_new_techniques_agricultural_biotechnology.pdf

Laaninen T. New plant-breeding techniques Applicability of EU GMO rules. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service; 2019. (Accessed September 15 2020) Available:https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/642235/EPRS_BRI(2019)642235_EN.pdf

OGTR. National regulatory scheme for genetically modified organisms; 2019a. (Accessed Mar 17, 2020) Available:http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/legislation-2

OGTR. Gene Technology Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Regulations; 2019b. (Accessed May 17, 2020) Available:https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00573

OGTR. Explanatory statement. Explanatory statement- select legislative instrument 2019 No. XX. Gene Technology Act 2000; 2019c. (Accessed May 17, 2020) Available:https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2019L00573/Explanatory%20Statement/Text

OGTR (Office of Gene Technology Regulator). Technical review of the gene technology regulations 2001 - 2016 Discussion Paper Consultation; 2016. (Accessed May 17, 2020)


Thygesen P. Clarifying the regulation of genome editing in Australia: Situation for genetically modified organisms. Transgenic Res. 2019;28:151–159. (Accessed May 17, 2020) Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-019-00151-4

FSANZ. Consultation paper food derived using new breeding techniques; 2018a. (Accessed May19, 2020) (Accessed May 17, 2020) Available:https://www.foodstandards.govt.nz/consumer/gmfood/Documents/Consultation%20paper%20-%20Food%20derived%20using%20new%20breeding%20techniques.pdf

FSANZ. Preliminary report - Review of food derived using new breeding techniques –consultation outcomes; 2018b. (Accessed May 19, 2020)

Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). The regulatory implications of new breeding techniques; 2016. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2016/0011

Juma C, Serageldin I. Freedom to innovate: Biotechnology in Africa's development. Report of the High-Level African Panel on Modern Biotechnology. African Union, Addis Ababa; 2007. (Accessed September 15, 2020) (Accessed June 13, 2020) Available:https://books.google.co.ug/books/about/Freedom_to_innovate.html?id=XJVKAAAAYAAJ

Kenya National Biosafety Authority (KNBA). Guidelines on Genome Editing; 2020. (Accessed July 2, 2020) Available:http://ke.biosafetyclearinghouse.net/approvedgmo.shtml

Kenya National Biosafety Authority (KNBA). Approved Genetically Modified organisms’ projects; 2020. (Access July 2, 2020) Available:http://ke.biosafetyclearinghouse.net/approvedgmo.shtml

Oliva R, Chonghui JI, Gatienza-Grande G, et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(11): 1344–1350. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0267-z

Kenya National Biosafety Authority (KNBA). Guidelines for determining the regulatory process of genome editing techniques in Kenya. Kenya National Biosafety Authority; 2019. Available:ttp://biosafetykenya.go.ke/ (Draft Guidelines not Published Yet)