Studies on Bioethanol Production with Thermo Tolerant Yeast Isolates and their Co-Cultures using African Wild Cocoyam as Feedstock
Asian Journal of Biotechnology and Bioresource Technology,
In this work different ways of optimally producing bioethanol at various pH with thermotolerant yeasts and their cocultures using a non-human edible starchy food as feedstock was examined. African wild cocoyam, Xanthosoma roseum, sourced from abandoned farmlands in Obukpa, Nsukka, Nigeria was used as the substrate, while strains of Kluyveromyces marxianus and Pichia stipitis were used to ferment them. First the tubers were gelatinized by boiling under pressure above 100oC before hydrolysis with concentrated H2SO4. The hydrolysates were then fermented at 35oC with the thermotolerant yeasts for five days at different pH. Results obtained showed that gelatinized sample of the substrate gave optimum glucose yield when hydrolysed with 1M H2SO4 for 60 minutes. Kluyveromyces marxianus produced more ethanol than Pichia stipitis at all the four fermentation pH values tested. However, optimum ethanol production was obtained when the two yeast strains were used as coculture at pH 4.5. The peak time for ethanol production was 96 hours for the individual yeast cultures while that of their coculture was 72 hours. The results of the study indicated that wild cocoyam is an excellent feedstock for bioethanol production with many advantages including being non-edible, thereby eliminating concerns for food security, and containing high amount of carbohydrate. The study also revealed that fermenting sugar hydrolysates with a coculture of microorganisms during bioethanol production is a more efficient process than using individual cultures.
- yeast strains
How to Cite
Sievers E. Ethanol and transport – its role in climate action;2017.
Praptijanto A, Muharam A, Nur A, Putrasari Y. Effect of ethanol percentage for diesel engine performance using virtual engine simulation tool. Energy Procedia. 2015;68:345e354.
Ndubuisi IA, Nweze JE, Onoyima NJ, Yoshinori M, Ogbonna JC. Ethanol production from cassava pulp by a newly isolated thermotolerant Pichia kudriavzevii LC375240. Energy and Power Eng. 2018; 10:457-474.
Adeleye TM, Kareem SO, Bankole MO, Atanda O, Adeogun AI. Ethanol production from cassava starch by protoplast fusants of Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Galactomyces candidum. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2020;7:67-81.
Patle, S, Lal B. Ethanol production from hydrolyzed agricultural wastes using mixed culture of Zymomonas mobilis and Candida tropicalis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2007;29:1839–1843.
Braide W, Nwaoguikpe RN. Production of ethanol from cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta). Int. J. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2011;3:64-66.
Adelekan BA. An evaluation of the global potential of cocoyam (Colocasia and Xanthosoma species) as an energy crop. British J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2011;2:1-15.
Hashem M, Zohri ANA, Maysa MAA. Optimization of the fermentation conditions for ethanol production by new thermotolerant yeast strains of Kluyveromyces sp. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2013;7: 4550-4561.
Limtong S, Sringiew C, Yongmanitchai W. Production of Fuel Ethanol at High Temperature from Sugar Cane Juice by a Newly Isolated Kluyveromyces marxianus. Bioresour. Technol. 2007;98:3367-3374.
Tae-Young L, Myoung-Dong K, Kyu-Yong K, Kyungmoon P, Park YR, Jin-Ho S. A parametric study on ethanol production from xylose by Pichia stipitis. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2000;5:27-31.
West TP, Kennedy D. Isolation of thermotolerant yeast strains for ethanol production: A need for new approaches. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2014;6:1-2.
AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington. D.C. 1990;1-50.
Lau O, Luk S. Spectrophotometric method for the determination of ethanol in beverages and beer samples using cerium (IV) as reagent. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2004;29:469-472.
Kayser FH, Bienz KA, Johannes Eckert J, Zinkernagel RM. Atlas of Medical Microbiology. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 2005.
Apiradee S. Isolation and characterization of thermotolerant yeast for ethanol production. An M.Sc. Thesis of Suranaree University of Technology, Malaysia;2006.
Caputi AJ, Ueda M, Brown T. Spectrophotometric determination of ethanol of wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1968;19:160.
Oyeleke SB, Dauda BEN, Oyewole OA, Okoliegbe IN, Ojebode T. Production of bioethanol from cassava and sweet potato peels. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2012;6:241-245.
Abosede ME, Adedotun AA, Wahab OO. Isolation and characterisation of yeast from local foods. J. Yeasts Fungal Res. 2013;4:38-48.
Dien BS, Cotta MA, Jeffries TW. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production current status. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003;63:258-266.
El-Tayeb TS, Abdelhafez AA, Ali SH, Ramadan EM. Effect of acid hydrolysis and fungal biotreatment on agro-industrial wastes for obtainment of free sugars for bioethanol production. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012;43:1523-1535.
Abidin Z, Saraswati E, Naid T. Bioethanol production from waste of the cassava peel (Manihot esculenta) by acid hydrolysis and fermentation process. Int. J. Pharm Tech Res. 2012;6:1209-1212.
DelCampo I, Alegría I, Zazpe M, Echeverría M, EcheverríaI V. Diluted acid hydrolysis pretreatment of agri-food waste for bioethanol production. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2006; 24: 214-221.
El-Naggar NE, Deraz S, Khalil A. Bioethanol production from lignocellulosic feedstocks based on enzymatic hydrolysis: current status and recent developments. Biotechnol. 2014;3:1-21.
Arif AR, Natsir H, Rohani H, Karim A. Effect of pH fermentation on production bioethanol from jackfruit seeds (Artocarpus heterophyllus) through separate fermentation hydrolysis method. The 2nd International Conference on Science (ICOS). IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series. 2018;979:012015
Tesfaw A, Assefa F. Co-culture: A great promising method in single cell protein production. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014;9:12-20.
Gutierrez-Correa M, Portal L, Moreno P, Tengerdy RP. Mixed culture solid substrate fermentation of Trichoderma reesei with Aspergillus niger on sugar cane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 1999;68: 173-178.
Abstract View: 67 times
PDF Download: 36 times